Benjamin Franklin once said “An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.” In today’s always connected society, this quote is especially relevant. Technology, and the world wide web in particular, have made it easy for nearly anyone with a computer to publish their thoughts online. But like any other tool that can be used for good, it can also be misused.
Microsoft has developed a reputation, dare I say notoriety, for quirky software that is full of bugs and easy to exploit by hackers. Apple even takes advantage of this notoriety in their “I’m a Mac” commercials. But here is a dirty little secret about those bugs: they don’t generally cause any harm unless someone with malicious intent sets out to exploit them. So to make software more secure, they use what is known as the principle of least trust. That is, their software is designed to distrust input and then explicitly check each input to determine if it is safe and then appropriate. This can get technical so I won’t bore you with the details.
The world wide web works in the same way. There are web sites you have identified as appropriate and trustworthy, others that are inappropriate or untrustworthy, and then there are others you just don’t know anything about. These are the sites that you don’t even realize can do damage to your computer by spreading viruses or installing Trojan Horses. They can also do intangible damage by showing content that is inappropriate for many, with the intent of making a buck regardless of who it harms.
Sites like Facebook, My Space, blogs, etc. operate and thrive on what is called “user-generated content”. What this means is that it is difficult and potentially counter-productive for them to verify every input (i.e. ad, blog post, story, photo, video, etc.) While much, of the content is fine, it’s extremely easy for someone with malicious intent to publish inappropriate or downright dangerous content, because that input is trusted and not verified as appropriate and safe.
For example, when I have used Facebook, I’ve seen multiple ads with photos of people in sexual situations. These ads were embedded into the Star Wars Figures application. This in an application that you would expect kids to play with. I’ve also seen ads on my page to meet sexy singles in the town I live in, but I’m happily married, faithful and my Facebook profile has indicated this from the very beginning. So why did I receive these ads? Because someone wanted me to see them. Always remember: advertising is targeted. If there are inappropriate ads in a kids application, they are there because someone paid to have them there. I’ve seen many such ads in that application as well as others.
Going back to our friend Mr. Franklin, my point is that it is better for a parent or guardian to block access to all web sites and then take the time to review and approve them on a case-by-case basis. Sure it may take a little more effort on your part, but aren’t your kids worth it?
If you are one of those who believes that such an approach is too much work, I ask you this question: Would you let your kids run wild and unsupervised in the city, visiting any business, hotel, back alley or meth lab they like?
Of course not! So why would you let them do the same online?